Evidence in Orthodontics
11- Which RME Type Wins in the Long Run A 5-Year Comparison
Played straight from the show's own feed. We do not host, copy or re-cut anybody's audio, and nothing loads until you press play.
What it is about
Comparison: - Analyzed tooth-borne vs. tooth-borne-borne RME appliances - Conducted via a randomized controlled trial with a five-year follow-up Outcome: - Both appliances stable long-term - Minimal clinical differences despite measurable variation Recommendation: - Standard tooth-borne expanders sufficient for young patients - Hybrid design may aid older adolescents or cases with higher skeletal resistance…
There is no transcript here, and only the host could change that.
These are somebody else's words. Evidence in Orthodontics belongs to whoever makes it, and we are not going to publish a transcript of it without being asked. Claiming the show puts that permission on the file. It is the only thing that could ever put a transcript here, we have not written one yet, and we are not promising a date.