Evidence in Orthodontics
11- Which RME Type Wins in the Long Run A 5-Year Comparison
Played straight from the show's own feed. We do not host, copy or re-cut anybody's audio, and nothing loads until you press play.
What it is about
Comparison: - Analyzed tooth-borne vs. tooth-borne-borne RME appliances - Conducted via a randomized controlled trial with a five-year follow-up Outcome: - Both appliances stable long-term - Minimal clinical differences despite measurable variation Recommendation: - Standard tooth-borne expanders sufficient for young patients - Hybrid design may aid older adolescents or cases with higher skeletal resistance…
The transcript unlocks when the host claims this show.
These are somebody else's words. Evidence in Orthodontics belongs to whoever makes it, and we are not going to publish a transcript of it without being asked. Claim the show and transcripts turn on for every episode, right here, with your name on the page.