INNOVATION·IN·DENTISTRY

Score report · method v1-pending · scored August 24, 2026

Bruce B. Baird

Here is everything behind both numbers. What we measured, what we found, what each piece is worth, and where we got it. Nothing here is rounded in our favour.

Influence55
Innovation25
Independent sources12
Rank95

Influence

Reach and resonance · weights out of 100
55
What we measuredWhat we found, and whereWeightPoints
I1Audience reach index — owned channels, blendedListen Score 36, top 2.5%, percentile against measured peers · verified · from Listen Notes Listen Score, YouTube Data API, public follower counts · percentile against scored people · method3070
I2Earned links — distinct registrable domains574 sites link to productivedentist.com, counted once per domain, read 2026-08-24 · verified · from backlink API — not budgeted for v1 · log-normalized against 500 domains · method25100
I3Third-party appearances — guest credits and verified speaking12 on file across 1 circuit, worth 77% of full credit once age is taken off · verified · from Podchaser credits, published event programs · log-normalized, 18-month half-life · method2048
I4On-hub resonance — pageviews, citations, detected badge embedsno traffic here yet — zero for everyone, and the weight is held rather than shared out · verified · from first-party analytics and badge embeds · percentile against scored people · method150
I5Cross-entity affiliation, at a ×0.5 transfer capno show or company of theirs is in the index yet, so there is nothing to carry · verified · from linked entities inside this index · linked score × 0.5 · method100

Innovation

Substance and momentum · weights out of 100
25
What we measuredWhat we found, and whereWeightPoints
N1Editorial review, signednot measured — estimated at the flat quarter mark — only 0 of 1008 were measurable, too few to take an unbiased quartile of · imputed · from agent pass plus a named human editor (rubric §4) · five criteria, 1–5 each · method3025
N2Published work × innovation relevance266 pieces; none of the recent titles were readable, so relevance is credited at nothing · unverified · from public bibliography, feeds, verified releases · log-normalized × relevance · method2547
N7Freshnesslast published 160 days ago · unverified · from canonical feed or newsroom · linear decay over 180 days · method1511
N4Verified awards and accoladesnone with a link on the awarding organisation's own site · verified · from self-reported, verified against a public source · published band table · method120
N8Profile completeness (capped)5 of 12 fields filled in · verified · from the profile itself · verified fields ÷ total fields · method1042
N5Peer endorsements from claimed profilesendorsements come from other claimed pages, and nobody has claimed one yet · verified · from first-party, claimed profiles only · actor-weighted count · method80

The three moves worth the most

ranked by what they are actually worth
01From the last scoring run. Give the review something to read — a specific claim, a named outcome, a link that is not your own marketing. Adjectives score a one.
02From the last scoring run. Put the badge on your own site and link back here. It is free, and it is the one piece a claim moves straight away.
03From the last scoring run. Publish work that says plainly what is new about it. Volume on its own is discounted by how much of it is actually about new methods.
None of these are for sale

Every move above is something you do, not something you buy. Paid placement buys badges, labelled rails, richer media and analytics. It buys zero points. The scoring system cannot see the billing system.

Where these facts came from

Claim this pageBack to the pageSomething wrong? Tell us